THE SOCIALIST REVOLUTION


The Russian Revolution, referred to as the ‘Great October Socialist Revolution,’ took place one hundred years ago on November 7 (October 25 on the calendar in force in Russia at the time). Although the revolution was inspired by noble ideas and ideals, mainly the elimination of exploitation and poverty and the creation of a party to represent the interests of the working class to do so, it did not survive the 20th century. China and Vietnam claim to be building ‘socialism’ with their own characteristics, while establishing capitalist economies. Once ‘progressive’ developing countries  have all been ensnared by globalization and neoliberalism.

The ideas of colonial liberation were given a substantial impetus by the Russian Revolution. The defeat of fascism in 1945, the Independence of India in 1947 and the liberation of China in 1949 set the stage for the dismantling of the remainder of the British Empire. These were the major events that inspired the leaders of liberation movements all over the world, including Guyana. Along the way many of them absorbed the ideas of Marx, the theorist, and Lenin, the practitioner.

The Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, the Vietnamese Revolution, the Cuban Revolution, all added distinct features to the various methods by which colonialist or imperialist oppression could be overcome. Peaceful means were also adopted and perfected in many countries, not only in colonies but in countries where dictatorships had been previously installed. Along the way, means were found by communists to collaborate with ‘anti-imperialist’ revolutionaries, called ‘revolutionary democrats,’ who were not fully ‘Marxist’ or ‘Marxist-Leninist.’ The techniques of economic development for countries with colonial or colonial-type economies were developed, called the ‘non-capitalist’ path of development. This path included, and even recommended, selected strategies of capitalist development. These new ideas proliferated under the banner of the ‘national liberation’ revolution.

Guyana escaped neither these developments nor the Cold War which was launched by the West against the USSR, the existing ‘socialist’ countries and those threatening, as perceived by the West, that they might go ‘communist.’ This policy swept up patriotic leaders, democrats and others who merely sought to protect and defend their peoples and economies, such as Mossadeq of Iran who was overthrown by the CIA in 1953 and Arbenz of Guatemala, who was similarly removed in 1954. Just as the origins of the past and present difficulties in those countries can be traced to those events, so the developments in Guyana can be traced to the removal of the PPP by the British government in 1953, acting against a leader who was then much in the mould of Mossadeq and Arbenz, heading a broad-based, mass, party, the PPP, which had a left but moderate leadership with a patriotic orientation.

After the second overthrow in 1964 Cheddi Jagan and the PPP grew increasingly left. Feeling betrayed by the West, the PPP embraced the world socialist movement in 1968. Forbes Burnham, who initially led a ‘moderate’ break-up of the PPP in 1955 and formed the PNC, with pro-Western help and credentials, eventually also led the PNC to the left. The Sophia Declaration of 1974 and subsequent statements left no doubt that Burnham and his party had embraced socialism and Marxism-Leninism.

Like elsewhere, ‘socialism’ failed in Guyana. In addition to the state of the world economy, the drying up of aid and the rise in oil prices, there were specific Guyanese factors. The success of socialist policies requires a democratic foundation, namely, the unity of the working class and their mobilization behind the policies. The failure to introduce democratic means of economic administration and electoral democracy, even with the protections for the minority offered by the PPP under the national patriotic front (where the majority party would concede the executive presidency to the minority party), ensured that the ‘socialist’ experiment would fail. But during this era, motivated by ideals, Guyana orchestrated the Caribbean’s recognition of Cuba, opened diplomatic relations with China and was a Non- Aligned Movement leader.

The PPP and PNC have now abandoned all pretence of being influenced by socialist ideas and, except perhaps for a few diehards in the PPP, would not even utter the word. But the enduring popularity of socialist ideals for which, by the way, there is a resurgence in the USA and UK, is an obstacle to its formal elimination in stated party policies and influence in party structures.

It may well be that the leaderships of today have no patience with, and have given short shrift to, that past and its ideals and, having abandoned it, would like to bury and forget about it as quickly as possible. Annual homage to their past leaders omit any references to socialism. And its absence shows. Their social and economic objectives have no grand plan, no overarching philosophy, no inspirational political or economic principles, no people-centred objectives, no plan to eliminate ethnic dominance in politics. The noble objectives of socialism, elaborated in documents such as The New Global Human Order and others, where it is demonstrated how poverty could be eliminated in the world with modest reforms and the will of Western countries, are no longer a part of our national discourse. Only coarse insults to the intelligence and to the person remain.

4 thoughts on “THE SOCIALIST REVOLUTION

  1. Sorry Mr. Ramkarran, but there was nothing moderate about the leaders of the PPP, Cheddie and Janet Jagan ! Their absolute and un-bending support and belief in Marxism-Leninism was undeniably the cause of Burnham’s ascension to the leadership , and the consequential unfortunate disaster that we call Guyana !

    Why did it have to take forty years for Cheddie Jagan to admit that he was wrong and that he made mistakes? The result of his procrastination resulted in the mastication of Guyana in the eyes of the world, and indeed the massive suffering that was foisted upon the people of Guyana by Burnham and his band of diabolicals.

    Today we have a follower of Burnham, David Granger, spouting Burnham’s praises while at the same time holding on to the reins of our country and vowing to bring back Burnham’s policies of 1964 to 1992, policies that failed and reduced Guyana to the status of a failed state and the consequential suffering that it spawned. If Cheddie and Janet Jagan had not so unflinchingly propagated and held on to the supposed “paradise” of Communism there would not have been a Forbes Burnham and the resulting disaster that was foisted on the people of Guyana.

    After all, forty some odd years after the Jagans started their crusade of Marxism-Leninism in Guyana they admitted they were wrong…….. over forty long years Mr. Ramkarran ! Their adherence to that ideology was very profound and sincere in it’s entirety. That was certainly not the appearance and act of moderation if done by anyone, and that certainly includes the Jagans.

  2. Ralph Ramkarran was in Queens, NY two months ago. He was a simple, curt question, “Was Jagan a communist?”.
    Ramkarran answered the question in one word, “Yes”.
    The larger question is this: The followers of Jagan, including Ramkarran were not communists – but they still followed Jagan blindly. It is like this: – We follow the ethnic leader no matter what he calls himself or his party.
    Same is true of Burnham. His followers praised him in 1960-65 for not being a communist. When around 1970, Burnham declared himself a communist and opened up diplomatic and trade relationships with all the communist countries, his followers still followed him.
    It was really worshiping an cult/ethnic leader no matter what ideology he embraces

    • You are right Mike Persaud, and that’s why I have been saying since 1968 that Guyana has to be partitioned into an Indo-Guyana and an Afro-Guyana. That is the only way people will feel, and be, safe in their own surroundings.

  3. guys go back to the drawing board. our people are being liberated, most politically conscious in the caribbean. because of those 2 leaders we can make a educated contrast. Partition is going backwards asa nation.

Leave a Reply