A PAEAN TO CENSORSHIP

Written by Ralph Ramkarran
Saturday, 23rd April 2016, 9:00 pm

It takes a certain mindset for a person to believe that he or she has the right to determine what information, otherwise lawful, that the citizens of Guyana should receive. Inculcated among some media practitioners and political operatives during the 1970s and 1980s, and pursued with vigour and venom between 2001 and 2015, this mindset is clearly alive and well in Guyana. State-owned media has long been seen as a party asset to be utilized for the benefit of the Government and Party in office.

Given the opportunity to reject censorship, the Guyana Chronicle did the opposite. In justifying its failure to publish its own columnist, Dr. David Hinds, because it did not agree with the views he expressed on two occasions, it embarked on a paean to censorship in its editorial of April 20 entitled “The state newspaper.” It reiterated an earlier statement that “this newspaper is an arm of the state and will give primacy to the government’s agenda.” How is this different to the policy of the Chronicle during the eras mentioned above? The Chronicle is not an arm of the State. The State is merely a trustee of its owners who are the people of Guyana. I am a part owner of the Chronicle.

Continue reading “A PAEAN TO CENSORSHIP”

MERCY MUST BE TEMPERED WITH JUSTICE

Written by Ralph Ramkarran
Saturday, 16th April 2016, 9:00 pm

The Advisory Committee, recently appointed by the President, has constitutional responsibility only in relation to persons who have been sentenced to death. But article 190 of the Constitution, which provides for its functions, omits to state what exactly in relation to the sentence of death the Advisory Council is to advise on, even though as a matter of practice it is known that the Advisory Council advises on the commuting of death sentences.

In article 188 the President is given extensive powers in relation to prisoners. After consultation with the Minister, the President may grant to any convicted prisoner a free or conditional pardon, an indefinite respite or for a prescribed period, a less severe form of punishment or a remission of the whole or part of a punishment.

Continue reading “MERCY MUST BE TEMPERED WITH JUSTICE”

THE CULTURE OF DOMINANCE IN GUYANA’S POLITICS

Written by Ralph Ramkarran
Saturday, 9th April 2016, 9:00 pm

The Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Bharrat Jagdeo, told the press that he and Minister of Social Cohesion, Minister Amna Ally, with the objective of resolving the political impasse that occurred as a result of the PPP and APNU obtaining an equal number of seats in five NDCs and one township elections, had agreed that the mayor and chairs of the NDCs should rotate annually. According to Jagdeo, he was told that President Granger had approved the agreement. He further asserted that the decision was revoked by the Government, which proposed that three of the six bodies should be led by APNU and three by the PPP. Minister Bulkan made no comment on the alleged agreement but appeared to have confirmed the Government’s position of three/three. He said that since the PPP rejected the compromise he proceeded to appoint APNU members as heads of all six bodies.

No one should be surprised that our two main political parties cannot agree on anything. In relation to regional elections the parties tried on two occasions in the past to cooperate without success. In 1994 the parties agreed to share the position of the mayor of Georgetown. When the PPP’s turn came the PNC reneged on the agreement. In the 2006 regional elections the parties obtained an equal number of seats in region 7. An agreement to share the post of chair was discarded by the PNCR when the elections for chair took place a few days later. It is to the credit of the PPP that even with these experiences it sought to address the current impasse by compromise.

Continue reading “THE CULTURE OF DOMINANCE IN GUYANA’S POLITICS”

THE BRIAN TIWARI AFFAIR

Written by Ralph Ramkarran
Saturday, 2nd April 2016, 9:00 pm

President Granger’s swift and decisive action, tersely announced, to terminate the appointment of Mr. Brian Tiwari as a government adviser on business, dramatized an event that has titillated the political classes and has energized the media. It is clear that the President allows his officials enough latitude to get on with the job but that he also expects them as politicians, or holding political offices, to be sensitive to political currents so that they know when to consult or seek clearance for decisions which may have political ramifications. No one should now doubt that President Granger is prepared to boldly intervene, if and when he considers it necessary.

Brian Tiwari abandoned traditional methods and began to overreach since 1992. It made him into an enormously wealthy man. Refining basic skills of negotiation and transforming the magician’s mantra of ‘the more you watch the less you see’ into business strategies that won vast variations of already vast contracts, high prices for suddenly scarce quarry products, buying and selling land at enormous profit, acquiring and selling mining properties at even greater profit, BK International has grown into a diverse conglomerate.

Continue reading “THE BRIAN TIWARI AFFAIR”